GMP to be commended

To the Editor:

Green Mountain Power, in its efforts to make Rutland the renewable energy capitol of Vermont, is to be commended. Indeed, its public relations campaign has succeeded so well that its virtues are daily extolled in editorials and publicly praised by politicians, and even the police chief.

Is it any wonder that under the capable hands of GMP C.E.O. Mary Powell and her enabling partner Gov. Shumlin, that all the hills of Vermont will soon be humming inexorable turbine tunes and valleys abloom with photo-voltaic cells.

But not so fast, please, lest we laud too much, it is not all altruistic.

GMP stands to benefit mightily from its efforts: each installation of renewable energy devices by GMP is, first, highly subsidized by the taxpayer and second, the ratepayer pays in excess of three times the cost of base load generation.

Gov. Shumlin, his Commissioner and other minions on the Public Service Board, are promoting wind and solar power, now under 2%, of generation to be 90% by 2020. Now, that is an inane proposition -- simply a physical improbability.

But, anyhow improbable, it is politically attractive, so let's cap all those hills with wind towers and fill all the valley slopes with solar panels.

But, again, not so fast, "Europe's Renewables Romance Fades" (David Garman and Samuel Thernstrom); "Denmark gets 30% of its electricity from wind and hopes to produce 50% by 2020. Germany, produces roughly 12% of its electricity from wind and solar today, and it wants to reach 35% by 2020."

"Clean energy powered by renewable resources is understandably attractive. But the honeymoon with renewables is ending as the practical challenges become clear; the first challenge is cost. Germany has invested more than 350 billion in renewable energy deployment and its households pay the highest power costs in Europe, except for the Danish. On average Germans and Danes pay roughly 300% more for residential electricity than Americans do."

And then, besides high costs, we have reliability; dependence on renewable energy equals potential blackouts.

And we also have GMP promoting "Heat Pumps" for residential heating. You will save on heating fuel costs states GMP. But what about the costs to power the heat pumps? Won't higher and higher electrical bills be in store for powering heat pump generation? Which will offset any heating fuel costs savings.

William Kevan

Randolph, Vt.

0
0
0
0
0

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.